Archive for the ‘Computation’ Category

EMPAC: The Instrument

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

I just finished writing an essay as part of a book we are developing at Grimshaw on EMPAC.  I am including that text here…

The development of the wood enclosure surrounding EMPAC’s Concert Hall was cutting edge in its processes and use of technology from concept to construction.  From the very beginning, references to the geometry of musical instruments guided the development of form and space at EMPAC.  This reached its culmination on the curving wood enclosure.

As part of the acoustic strategy, the Concert Hall at EMPAC is a double-shelled object.  Beyond the cast stone acoustic panels and waveform wood paneling lining the Concert Hall interior is a concrete shell encased by a secondary and offset wood shell.  Between these shells is housed circulation spaces supporting primary entries and exits, back-of-house areas, and the mechanical runs that are necessary for the proper operation of the performance space.

The Concert Hall wood enclosure, or “wood hull” as we called it, was developed as a unifying surface – giving continuity and polish to the outside of the Concert Hall and its amalgam of support program appendages.  The wood hull was created using lofted NURBS surfaces (Non-Uniform Rational Bezier-Splines), a three-dimensional geometric system that results in a continually smooth finish.  Long the domain of the car and industrial design industries, EMPAC’s NURBS surface was developed using high-end CAD (computer aided design) software.  This 3D model became the ultimate development and collaboration document for the hull, guiding the coordination of both mechanical and structural systems, and allowing for rapid yet accurate iterations of the design through all phases.  During the complex refinement process of reconciling the inner form of the concert hall with the smooth outer shell we generated over one hundred iterations of the surface model.

EMPAC - Digital Surface Model

Continuous and smooth surface curvature suggests the fluid realm of art and nature, whereas hard edges and creases suggest the precise, man-made, and the known.  EMPAC, a venue where art and science exist in a constant dialogue, was expressed in both geometric types.  At the moment the continuous surface of the wood hull meets an entrance we have a clean-cut shape leading you into the Concert Hall interior.  This was accomplished by intersecting circular and elliptical cones with the original NURBS surface, resulting in a deliberate carving.

At each stage the surface was checked using curvature analysis.  Of interest were smooth blends between areas of greater curvature and their flatter neighbors, all the while keeping an eye out for surface inversions that would result in unflattering deformations and shadows.

EMPAC - NURBS lofts curvature analysisEMPAC - Surface curvature analysis

The coordination effort with the hull was not limited to internal Concert Hall spaces.  Proximities and intersections with adjacent objects including the north curtain wall and the roof, and a recognition that the space around the hull was as important to its perception as the shape of the object itself, helped drive the final form development.  Where the hull penetrates through the glass façade to the outside, we transition materials from wood to metal panel.  Where the hull geometry intersects the roof we placed a continuous skylight allowing both direct and indirect washes of light to graze the wood surface.

The patterning of the wood surface was of great importance to how the form would be experienced in space.  At the outset, we believed using a tongue-and-groove array of boards would help accentuate the surface curvature while helping to bring down the details to a human scale.  Early studies began with a local shipbuilding company about how this fabrication technique might be realized.  These discussions led to a concern over the unpredictability of the patterning due to the complex nature of the surface.  In addition, the unrelenting nature of a single pattern across the surface led us to implement a variation by introducing a herringbone pattern that followed the cadence of columns along the north curtain wall.  This added much needed mid-scale texture and helped energize the surface.

Throughout the latter half of the project’s design phases, this 3D digital prototype was used as a coordination system between Grimshaw David Brody Bond and Buro Happold.  This transitioned into the subcontractor, AWI (Architectural Woodwork Industries), using the same 3D model to develop and coordinate fabrication and installation.  Led by Rick Herskovitz, AWI worked with us, the rest of the design team, and Turner Construction to digitally resolved any potential conflicts in the construction process well in advance of onsite construction.

Various mockups were developed to explore the appropriate wood species for the finish based on durability, workability, and the aesthetic desire for a wood of character and warmth.  Western Red Cedar, a wood commonly used as a sounding board for string instruments, was chosen as the finish material.  The cedar sourced for this project was sustainably harvested from the Queens Forest in British Columbia, Canada.  Based on the curvatures required on the hull, the cedar was air dried for 8 months to preserve its bending flexibility.

After selection of the wood species, a full-scale mockup was constructed as part of the fabrication development process.  The areas of tightest curvature, and the corner of an entry portal, were chosen as the best spot for the mockup as they represented the areas of greatest fabrication difficulty.  This mockup led to the development of the sub-frame system, wood board width and depth, applied finishes, and fastening methods.  Cedar is naturally flame resistant but a further mockup was fire-tested nevertheless to alleviate any lingering concerns about the combustibility of such a large amount of wood in a public space; the cedar passed this test resoundingly.

On the exterior of the concert hall concrete enclosure, the structural engineer developed a steel cage made of faceted wide flanges to help rough out the hull shape.  Then to achieve the extremely high positional accuracy that a panelized, double-curved surface requires, this steel superstructure was surveyed on site using a robotic laser transit and the data mapped back into the original 3D surface model for geometrical coordination.  The difference between the designed shape and the actual construction shape, in recognition of the rough faceting of the steel cage, was bridged using computer-controlled laser-cut steel blades welded to the steel cage.  The final edge of these steel blades matched the 3D surface model exactly as designed.  This created the fully calibrated framework onto which the final surface would emerge.

Using digital fabrication techniques driven by the 3D surface model, a series of 268 double-curved framed panels clad in sheet metal were CNC pre-fabricated offsite and numbered.  Each panel was unique and built to 0.005” tolerances.  These were then hoisted into place covering the surface of the entire hull.  Setout lines were inscribed onto the panels and the job began of bending and fastening each tongue-and-groove cedar board.  What began as an entirely digital process of form design, coordinating structural and mechanical systems, developing fabrication templates and simulating construction, ended with the hand placement of the natural wood finish.  Coming full circle back to the earliest material concepts, wood edge details took their cues from the shipbuilding industry.

The result is a labor of love from all those involved in its creation from design to construction. Through the common language of geometry and the exploration of a material’s innate qualities, the wood hull had become an emblem of EMPAC’s mission of yoking together art and science.

SmartGeometry 2009 Conference

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

SmartGeometry2009 Conference

I’ll be at the SmartGeometry 2009 Workshop and Conference March 26th to April 1st, teaching and attending.  You should be there too.

Teaching GenerativeComponents at Stevens

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

I’ll be teaching GenerativeComponents this Saturday, Feb 7th, at the Product Architecture Lab at the Stevens Institute of Technology.

If you want to attend, contact me through this page for more information…
http://www.smartgeometry.org/user/3/contact

SmartGeometry.ORG goes live

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

After months of work, the new SmartGeometry Group website is now live.

Information about the next conference (San Francisco 2009) has also been posted.

ACADIA 2008

Thursday, August 14th, 2008

I will be moderating a panel session at the 2008 ACADIA Conference in Minneapolis, early October.  The session is titled: Approaches to Environmental Performance and Analysis (http://www.acadia.org/acadia2008/?page_id=101)

Below is the text introduction for the session, to be included in the printed conference proceedings…

Over the past few years there has been an increased interest in environmental performance in the building industry.  This welcome shift has the potential to significantly alter and improve the way we conceive of and design the built environment.  It begins to direct architects towards an integrated design process in which early analysis work (usually left to engineers after the design is “complete”) has a greater influence on the design of the architectural project.  Performance analysis can affect building energy usage, spatial experience, and even aesthetic decisions.

No doubt one of the largest drivers for improving building performance is the need to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.  Virtually every decision in the design and construction process can be expressed as an energy/carbon quantity.  The built environment accounts for nearly half of all greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in the US; the figure is even higher globally.  Whether for new construction or the retrofitting of existing building stock, explorations into energy efficiency and conservation have the potential for immense impact on global energy usage.

Environmental impacts on architectural design may transcend simple calculations of efficiency and also affect the human experience of space.  Control of energy forces is not simply a monetary and fuel saver but also has experiential benefits for the inhabitant of the building. Access to natural sunlight while controlling glare and heat gain, fresh-air intake and temperature control by natural forces, all contribute to improving user comfort and productivity while simultaneously reducing energy consumption.  We should aim for a state of equilibrium: a building that operates in harmony with its environment and social context.

Lastly, an increase in computational power, embracement and occasional acquisition of analysis software by major AEC vendors, and the wealth of environmental and material data sets available to designers have made the journey towards integrated design easier.  Using computational tools to embed not just aesthetic but physical criteria into the design model enables a compelling iterative design process leading towards greater environmental performance.

The papers included in this section focus on the integration of such tools into the design process.  Ranging from student installations, studies in expressive and naturally occurring structural forms and biological systems, to integrated design with live energy calculations, and sociological experiments in environmental impact and interpretation, each seeks to position environmental performance as a primary influence in architectural design and production.  Building performance is no longer an afterthought left to engineers to resolve with mechanical systems, inefficient structures, or last-minute architectural decisions involving high U-value material selection.  Instead, architects are recognizing that every decision has an environmental impact, including large scale formal gestures.  As evidenced here and in my own work with Grimshaw Architects, environmental performance can be a strong creative force, helping to generate a wide array of efficient, adaptive, and dynamic solutions through compelling form and componentry.

What is the ultimate goal of this work?  Is it simply a set of measures aimed to meet government approvals for reduced building energy consumption?  An effort to shepherd the client through the usage of the Integrated Project Delivery model?  An interest in material economy to decrease cost and carbon footprint?  A method of implementing a truly sustainable building industry?  Each of these point towards usage of an architectural digital prototype in an analytical fashion to react to and mitigate known physical situations.  However, for environmental performance and analysis to have a true impact on architectural production, it must also be a catalyst for creativity.  This could manifest in the development and optimization of form, space, and componentry based on an integrated analytic process, or even an exploration into the aesthetic expression of natural systems and their relation to the human experience.

A Landscape of 3D Printed Skyscrapers

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

My ongoing research work into Performative Tower Designs at Grimshaw will be part of a gallery exhibition at SIGGRAPH 2008 in LA this August.
http://www.siggraph.org/s2008/attendees/design/14.php

SIGGRAPH - Tower B

I’ll post some images of the development to a new page soon as they are completed.